2017-2018 Team Projections - BigTen
TAPE Ratings show how a team would perform on a neutral site against an average BCS conference team.
| RANK | TEAM | CONF. | TAPE | OFFENSE | (RANK) | DEFENSE | (RANK) | PACE | (RANK) | At Large | Top 25 | Win Conf. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Wisconsin | BigTen | 798 | 110.05 | (15) | 95.45 | (1) | 62.15 | (345) | 97% | 83% | 45% |
| 14 | Michigan State | BigTen | 703 | 111.34 | (10) | 102.29 | (25) | 66.06 | (262) | 88% | 61% | 19% |
| 17 | Michigan | BigTen | 679 | 110.70 | (12) | 102.46 | (27) | 63.26 | (341) | 84% | 55% | 16% |
| 26 | Indiana | BigTen | 595 | 111.87 | (8) | 107.81 | (83) | 68.59 | (113) | 68% | 34% | 6% |
| 28 | Ohio State | BigTen | 580 | 105.07 | (51) | 101.67 | (21) | 67.89 | (147) | 64% | 31% | 5% |
| 32 | Iowa | BigTen | 557 | 108.35 | (21) | 105.97 | (64) | 69.18 | (84) | 59% | 25% | 3% |
| 47 | Maryland | BigTen | 528 | 104.45 | (59) | 103.26 | (31) | 66.49 | (238) | 52% | 20% | 2% |
| 48 | Minnesota | BigTen | 527 | 105.88 | (37) | 104.75 | (48) | 69.42 | (71) | 52% | 19% | 2% |
| 52 | Northwestern | BigTen | 500 | 104.99 | (53) | 105.01 | (51) | 63.73 | (338) | 46% | 16% | 1% |
| 60 | Purdue | BigTen | 461 | 104.00 | (66) | 105.68 | (58) | 67.55 | (175) | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 65 | Nebraska | BigTen | 443 | 102.48 | (80) | 104.90 | (50) | 66.96 | (213) | 32% | 9% | 0% |
| 76 | Penn State | BigTen | 386 | 100.25 | (98) | 105.09 | (53) | 68.15 | (128) | 20% | 4% | 0% |
| 84 | Illinois | BigTen | 345 | 99.77 | (106) | 106.61 | (67) | 66.92 | (215) | 14% | 2% | 0% |
| 119 | Rutgers | BigTen | 253 | 97.27 | (156) | 108.36 | (91) | 68.17 | (127) | 4% | 0% | 0% |
Conference Player Projections
Projected per-game averages, normalized to average D1 competition.
| Player | Class | Team | MIN | FGM | FGA | 3GM | 3GA | FTM | FTA | OREB | DREB | REB | AST | TO | STL | BLK | PF | PTS |
|---|